Against the objectification of books (or, some thoughts on The Discourse).

A few weeks back, The Washington Post ran a piece spotlighting “super readers,” a self-selecting class of book nerds who pride themselves on reading very, very fast. I clicked on this article even as my hackles rose, and some pre-programmed scorn settled in the back of my throat. Why, I asked the author, who could not hear me in Washington — Why pedestal the reader who goes to books like a buffet, craving quantity? Why is our culture so intent on praising folks for reading not wider or more deeply, but faster and more ? That’s a rhetorical question, of course. This late in the timeline, I can’t pretend to be surprised by the symptoms of capitalism. Books are not exempt from our relentless, always-be-optimizing productivity culture . Maris Kreizman observed a trend toward their “bulletpointification” in a recent column. “It’s troubling to see books treated like mere vessels for self-betterment the way that cold-water therapy and Fitbits are,” she wrote. I tend to agree. What strikes me — and Kreizman, later in her essay — is the profound incompatibility between the object of the book and the ethos of productivity. Novels, in general, take a long time to create and consume. Unlike other cultural products like, say, the TikTok, they are not necessarily designed for single-use, speedy consumption. Their effects, too, are nebulous. Such that they cannot be repurposed for advertising in easy, obvious ways. Because what one can “get” from a novel is rarely clear at the outset, their quantitative consumption — or, let’s just call it binging them, to keep with the times — seems particularly silly. And what do we hope to “get ,” anyway? When it’s not merely working as a portal to another universe, what’s a book even for these days? * If we follow the implicit WaPo thesis, one answer to this question might be: “being a metric for self-improvement.” After all, “super” is not a bad word to hear applied to oneself. Ditto, “achiever.” Or, “Meeter-of-goals.” I know from personal experience that apps like Goodreads, which allow one to set an […]

Click here to view original page at Against the objectification of books (or, some thoughts on The Discourse).

© 2024, wcadmin. All rights reserved, Writers Critique, LLC Unless otherwise noted, all posts remain copyright of their respective authors.

0 Reviews ( 0 out of 0 )

Share the Post:

Related Posts

A note to our visitors

This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.

small c popup

Let's have a chat

Get in touch.

Help us Grow.

Join today – $0 Free

Days :
Hours :
Minutes :
Seconds